Surfacing/Roadway Restoration
Gray County · est $2.9M
Bid dateThursday, October 1—
Low bidWINDING ROAD CONSTRUCTION, INC.$2.75M
Gray County · est $2.9M
5 published bidders
| Rank | Contractor | Published bid | Gap to low bid |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Low bid | WINDING ROAD CONSTRUCTION, INC. | $2,747,710.99 | — |
| 2 | O. TREVINO CONSTRUCTION, LLC | $2,860,812.20 | $113,101.21 |
| 3 | GILVIN-TERRILL, LTD. | $2,959,559.10 | $211,848.11 |
| 4 | SILVER CREEK CONSTRUCTION, INC. | $3,050,725.90 | $303,014.91 |
| 5 | TI-ZACK CONCRETE, INC. | $3,396,091.20 | $648,380.21 |
Source: TxDOT published bid tab. Low bid is the source-published position; it does not establish an agency award.
Review bid results in Workspace →Workspace access is required. The $199 project briefing is a separate purchase.
TxDOT source checked
No addenda matched in the stored source. Check TxDOT for current revisions before bidding.
Stored revisions can change. Confirm the current proposal and all applicable addenda with TxDOT.
How to read this. Bid amounts and plan requests are published TxDOT facts. Low bid describes a published position; it does not establish an agency award. Contractor links require an exact, unique match to the official vendor directory. Confirm current proposal revisions with TxDOT before bidding. More on what Cassandri does →
Typical scope · median of 4 comparable bids (TxDOT pavement, last 24 mo)
Typical scope is aggregated from 4 historical comparable bids. Per-item detail appears once this letting’s own bid form is published.